oe3ide wrote:BandStack2:
I just wanted to replace an "wrong" entry. I had 14.074 with mode "USB", wanted to change it to "DIGU". So I clicked on the band-button to go to his entry, unlocked the entry, deleted the entry and changed the mode to DIGU.
By adding this new record, it adds the first one in the list (14.194) instead of 14.074/DIGU.
73 Ernst
Ernst - thanks, I will take a look at this. The filter/stack knows we should technically be on the highlighted stack entry after the delete, but the VFO has not moved. This would not be ideal though in your case. I will have a head scratch. I have been thinking about an update as well.
rbduck - thanks for this. If the smeters have been the same for years, then they are no doubt fine. We would have had complaints that they didn't track signal standards and all sorts. In simplistic terms when an attenuation is applied to the hardware, the software does the reverse, it offsets the spectrum by that attenuation amount (including calibration, 6m and transverter shift). It has also been confirmed by Ernst that at least 21d is mirroring the 2019/2020 release of 2_8_11.
w2ner - I am not sure how the fixes to attenuate the correct adc would have an PS, working in 21c and not 21d. Can you let me know your radio model, show me screenshot of DDC page, and also the protocol you are using. The ddc/adc selection for attenuation is changing in 21e however.
i2noy - yes I blindly go through all checkboxes/radiobuttons and set the background colour to fix an issue Ernst was having with his skins
Eventually Ernst (and you) will tell me which ones to miss out
Problem noted.
ea3aqr - noted about start up state. Please open up the bandstack window, take screenshot, next to the vfo and panaptor.
Richie.
